light gazing, ışığa bakmak

Showing posts with label Imre Kertész. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Imre Kertész. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

quais são as probabilidades

de um autor notável ser bem tratado pela coisa editorial portuguesa? parece-me que muito baixas.
aqui estão 4 livros, o outro é da Verbo.


 
Crónica de uma metamorfose
Disponibilidade: Envio em 24 horas
11,11€

 
 
Disponibilidade: Envio em 24 horas
10,09€

 
 
Esgotado ou não disponível.
15,11€
  

 
 
Esgotado ou não disponível.
17,62€
  



por falar em probabilidades: o universo é regulado por elas, move-se por elas. é a mecânica por detrás da pele galáctica.

um pouco de 'Who Owns Auschwitz?'

"I don't think that this question is inevitably posed on the basis of dishonest motives. Rather, it expresses a natural longing, and the survivors, indeed, long for nothing else. Nonetheless, the decades have taught me that the only passable route to liberation leads us through memory. But there are various ways of remembering. The artist hopes that, through a precise description, leading him once more along the pathways of death, he will finally break through to the noblest kind of liberation, to a catharsis in which he can perhaps allow his reader to partake as well. But how many such works have come into being during the last century? I can count on ten fingers the number of writers who have produced truly great literature of world importance out of the experience of the Holocaust. We seldom meet with the likes of a Paul Celan, a Tadeusz Borowski, a Primo Levi, a Jean Améry, a Ruth Klüger, a Claude Lanzmann, or a Miklós Radóti.

More and more often, the Holocaust is stolen from its guardians and made into cheap consumer goods. Or else it is institutionalized, and around it is built a moral-political ritual, complete with a new and often phony language. Certain words come to be compelled by public discourse, and almost automatically set off the Holocaust-reflex in the listener or the reader. In every way possible and impossible, the Holocaust is rendered alien to human beings. The survivor is taught how he has to think about what he has experienced, regardless of whether or to what extent this "thinking-about" is consistent with his real experiences. The authentic witness is or will soon be perceived as being in the way, and will have to be shoved aside like the obstacle he is. The words of Améry prove their truth: "We, the victims, will appear as the truly incorrigible, irreconcilable ones, as the anti-historical reactionaries in the exact sense of the word, and in the end it will seem like a technical mishap that some of us still survived."

A Holocaust conformism has arisen, along with a Holocaust sentimentalism, a Holocaust canon, and a system of Holocaust taboos together with the ceremonial discourse that goes with it; Holocaust products for Holocaust consumers have been developed. Auschwitz-lies have appeared, and the figure of the Auschwitz con-man has come into being. Over the course of time we have come to know of one Holocaust guru, inundated with prizes for his achievements in literature and human rights, who gave first-hand reports of his indescribable experiences as a three- or four-year-old in the Majdanek extermination camp -- until it was determined that between 1941 and 1945 he hadn't left his bourgeois Swiss family's house, except perhaps to take a healthy stroll or sitting in his baby carriage. Meanwhile, we dwell in the midst of Spielberg's saurian kitsch and with the absurd chatter emerging from the fruitless discussions over the Berlin Holocaust monument. The time will come when Berliners -- along with foreigners who end up in Berlin, of course (above all, I imagine groups of assiduous Japanese tourists)--will stroll, sunk in peripatetic reflection and surrounded by the roar of Berlin traffic, through the Holocaust Park, complete with playground, while Spielberg's 48,239th interview-partner whispers -- or howls?--his own individual story of suffering in their ears."

Imre Kertész
some more here.

funcionalidade

"Je souhaite que l’homme devienne lui-même, envers et contre tout. Aujourd’hui, nous sommes entourés d’individus « fonctionnels » qui ne vivent pas leur propre vie. Ils vivent leur « fonction ». Et quand cette dernière change, ils changent. C’est tout. Il n’existe plus – ou peu – d’hommes tragiques, c’est-à-dire d’êtres qui disposent de leur propre sort, qui l’établissent pour eux-mêmes. J’aimerais que l’être humain refuse de devenir une pièce d’une grande machine sans âme. Je pense qu’il faut essayer de se construire soi-même, quel que soit le système qui nous entoure, en se regardant le plus lucidement possible.

Je me suis réalisé dans un univers mensonger en essayant d’être clairvoyant sur moi-même. J’ai l’impression d’y être parvenu, même si je ne suis pas sûr que ce soit le cas et que tout ait été fait pour que je n’y arrive pas. Au fond, la tâche est la même pour chacun d’entre nous. C’est une obligation d’être juste et vrai vis-à-vis de soi face à l’hypocrisie collective. C’est difficile, voire impossible, mais c’est ce vers quoi tend mon travail. D’ailleurs, si je refuse d’employer le terme d’autobiographie et que j’affirme écrire de la fiction, c’est aussi parce que je sais qu’il est difficile de se voir tel que l’on est. Le souci de vérité est ma clé."

Imre Kertész, from here.

Friday, July 11, 2014

13

"You spent thirteen years working on your first novel, Fatelessness."
art of fiction na Paris Review, com Kertész.

branco



"Kürti:

"He remained an innocent, like a old maid."
Obláth:
"I would rather phrase it that no one navigated those forty years as elegantly as he did. He floated like... like a..." He falls silent.
What he wanted to say was: He floated like a phantom albatross of unspotted whiteness on the ice gray ocean. But he concealed that he had no way of justifying the simile. He had been reading Moby Dick the previous evening, before falling asleep."
Kertész em Liquidation.


Tuesday, July 8, 2014

deriva literária

na minha vida. Playback de Chandler afinal não me apetece porque não quero correr a distância entre uma obra icónica incial e outra de fim de vida, com a carga de carregou, um pouco tóxica. Kadare resolveu ficar na Madeira, não o censuro, as senhoras do hotel resolveram detê-lo para leitura, também não as censuro, de modo que tenho de aguardar pela chegada do recém-nascido, até porque me agradava a cidade de pedra da história, que me faz lembrar um pouco Calvino e tudo o que me faz lembrar um pouco Calvino não é muito mau. entretanto isto (renovando a minha fé naqueles que escolhem o nobel). começa com:

"Then I went back into the house and wrote. It is midnight. The rain is beating on the windows. It was not midnight. It was not raining." Beckett, Molloy.

e

"Let us call our man, the hero of this story, Kingbitter. We imagine a man, and a name to go with him. Or conversely, let us imagine the name, and the man to go with it. Though this may all be avoided anyway since our man, the hero of this story, really is called Kingbitter."

assim é o início de Liquidation de Imre Kertész. não é preciso um génio para saber que vai ser bom.



Thursday, April 7, 2011

o oposto

"Then I went back into the house and wrote. It is midnight. The rain is beating on the windows. It was not midnight. It was not raining." Beckett em Molloy, no início de Liquidation de Imre Kertész.

 
Share